FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 7, 2007 |
Contact: Cindi Canary
(312)335-1767
|
PROTECT INTEGRITY OF CAPITAL SPENDING PLAN
WITH PAY-TO-PLAY REFORM LEGISLATION
Before the General Assembly adopts a new capital spending plan, whether it
is focused on roads and schools or includes bridge repair, it should enact new
limits on campaign contributions from state contractors.
“The story on page one of today's Sun-Times reminds us of the history
of links between state contractors and state campaigns. Antoin "Tony"
Rezko raised untold thousands for Gov. Blagojevich's campaign PAC. And once
in office, Rezko seeded the administration with friends, former staffers, business
partners and their children. His companies obtained lucrative contracts through
the tollway,” said ICPR Director Cynthia Canary. “Until his federal
corruption trial is over, no one will know exactly how perfidious the relationship
between Rezko and Blagojevich actually was.”
But Rezko was not alone, other examples include:
- IGOR the Watchdog gave Gov. Blagojevich's campaign fund $76K and saw
a $150K contract to oversee the sale of Tollway I-Pass transponders balloon
into a $7M deal.
- PWS Environmental gave Gov. Blagojevich's campaign fund $22K and got
a $522K contract from IDOT to power wash state buildings, including salt domes.
PWS' president was also the brother-in-law of then-IDOT Director Robert Millette.
- Harmony Health Plan of Illinois gave Gov. Blagojevich's campaign fund
$100K, in five $20K checks from different subsidiaries on the same day and later
got a $75M state contract.
All of these stories, well documented in the popular press, helped convince
voters that there is an unhealthy connection between campaign fund and state
contracts. That's in part why 86% of voters in last November's elections said
that corruption was very or extremely important to them. To ensure that a new
round of capital spending doesn't result in a new round of headlines, the state
must pass tough pay-to-play restrictions.
“We commend Sen. Jeff Schoenberg for doing yeoman's work to find a way
to include pay-to-play reforms in the same legislation as the pension and procurement
reforms, he has long advocated,” said Canary.
In the meantime, the House approved pay to play legislation (House Bill 1) more
than three months ago. If brought to a vote the Senate could send the legislation
to the Governor immediately. The time for inaction has long since passed.
###