From the Wall Street Journal:
Lawmakers Join Hunt
To Bag Big Donors Early
Presidential Herd Spurs
Rush for Limited Funds;
'I Get a Lot of Invites'
By LAURIE P. COHEN
March 28, 2007; Page A1
The unusually early and intense fund-raising push in the 2008 presidential campaign
is spurring congressional candidates into a hasty money chase as well, just two
months after the current class of lawmakers was sworn in.
The sheer number of campaigns hunting for seed money has intensified the competition
to tap big donors before they bump up against either legal or self-imposed caps
on what they can give during the current election cycle, fund-raisers say. The
rematch between Democrats and Republicans for control of the House and Senate
is also ratcheting up what has become a perpetual campaign-finance cycle.
Wealthy donors have always tended to give early in campaign cycles as favors to
friends and business associates, or because they are acquainted with candidates.
"More fund raising is going on by members of Congress because they're competing
with so many presidential candidates," says Jan Baran, a Washington campaign-finance
lawyer.
Individual campaign contributions are limited to $2,300 per candidate per election,
and $42,700 for all candidates. Donors also can contribute an additional $65,500
to political action committees and parties.
"It's a small group of people, but 95% of them are in New York, Washington,
Palm Beach and Hollywood," says David Hansen, who managed the 2006 re-election
campaign of veteran Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch. This quarter is "light
years more active" than previous election cycles, says Mr. Hansen.
Even though he isn't up again until 2012, Mr. Hatch attended a fund-raiser in
his behalf this month in Palm Beach, Fla. Wealthy donors say they also met this
month with Sen. Arlen Specter (R., Pa.), whose term is up in 2010, at Donald Trump's
18-acre Mar-a-Lago golf resort, for a fund-raiser organized by longtime Republican
consultant Roger Stone. "There's 11 guys running for president on the Republican
side, and senators are competing with them for everyone's money," Mr. Stone
says. Sen. Mel Martinez (R., Fla.), also up for re-election in 2010, has begun
an early round of fund raising, too. This month he attended a fund-raiser at the
home of a Fort Lauderdale attorney.
Much of the action has taken place in private homes and hotels in big-money hot
spots. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.), Sen. Mary Landrieu (D., La.), Sen. Carl
Levin (D., Mich.), Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa) and Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.)
all have had events in New York sponsored on their behalf in recent weeks. All
are up for re-election next year.
Mr. Durbin has attended about 50% more fund-raisers for his 2008 campaign this
quarter than in the same period in the 2002 election cycle, says his Illinois
chief of staff, Michael Daly, who has run the Illinois Democrat's campaigns since
1982.
Seasoned politicos, for their part, have also noticed the difference. "I
get a lot of invites, many more than in the past," says Gifford Miller, a
former New York City Council speaker.
Concrete data on fund raising to date in 2007 won't be available until mid-April,
when candidates are required to file their first-quarter reports with the Federal
Election Commission. But campaign staffers say that beyond pressures caused by
the early presidential jockeying, what could be a record-setting quarter for money
gathering is driven by the ever-steeper cost of elections. And there is always
a bit of a frenzied push early in campaigns to establish momentum.
At this stage, then, candidates tend to focus on corralling big-ticket contributors
-- who can give campaigns an air of viability as well as cash -- before embarking
on the more exhaustive hunt for small donors.
Other factors are also accelerating congressional fund-raising activity. The stakes
in Senate races are particularly high, for one thing. Democrats captured control
in 2006 with the narrowest of margins, making it extremely difficult to push legislation
through the chamber, and the party is eager to increase its majority.
Republicans, meanwhile, hope they can regain control. The Democratic Senatorial
Campaign Committee yesterday emailed out a fund-raising pitch with the subject
line "Nightmare Scenario" that opens: "One seat. That's all it
would take to flip Senate control...in 2008." The pitch sets a goal of raising
$300,000 by March 31.
Democrats see an opportunity to expand their majority next year, since 22 seats
currently held by Republicans will be up for grabs compared with just 11 Democrats'
seats. Just as Democrats wiped out moderate Republicans in liberal-leaning Northeastern
districts in the House in 2006, they are now strategizing to upend moderate Republicans
representing Democratic-leaning states in the Senate in the next election. One
is Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins. Victor Kovner, a New York lawyer, and
his wife, Sarah, a former official in the Clinton administration, hosted a fund-raiser
in their home this month for Rep. Tom Allen (D., Maine), an incumbent considering
a challenge to Ms. Collins.
For her part, Ms. Collins earlier this month attended an event sponsored for her
by Republican Kathryn Patterson Kempner. Ms. Collins's chief of staff, Steven
Abbott, says the lawmaker isn't racing for dollars faster than previous cycles.
But, he says, "The parties are feeling a lot of pressure because the presidential
campaigns pose direct competition for individual donors' money."
The House, too, is shaping up early as an expensive battleground. Republicans
are already plotting to retake the House, targeting in particular the large number
of freshmen Democrats, who are seen as the least entrenched and thus the most
vulnerable. Earlier this month, the Kovners also hosted a fund-raiser for freshman
Democratic Rep. John Hall of New York.
Ms. Kovner, a longtime political activist, says the early congressional fund-raisers
are largely geared toward ensuring that newly elected candidates have large campaign
war chests to discourage challengers. She adds that because of the presidential
campaign, "there is a fear that donors to individual campaigns will reach
their maximum spending limits sooner." Indeed, in addition to their two recent
congressional events, the Kovners were among the hosts of an event on March 18
at a midtown hotel for New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign.
House and Senate control can also drive the policy debate on key issues donors
care about, from Iraq and immigration to health care and taxes. Because both the
presidency and Congress are up for grabs at the same time, the power of a new
president to implement his or her agenda could hinge largely on which party prevails
on Capitol Hill.
Overall, there are relatively few donors who come anywhere close to approaching
the federal limits for total giving. In 2004, just 25,833 donors gave $10,000
or more, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit research
group. But that number is expected to rise this year, partly due to the increasing
political involvement of hedge-fund and Wall Street executives.
Many big donors are juggling both presidential and congressional candidates. Eric
Mindich, a former Goldman Sachs Group executive and now chief executive of New
York hedge fund Eton Park, co-hosted an event last month for Sen. Landrieu at
the home of Laurence Belfer, a private investor. Mr. Mindich is also raising money
for Illinois Democratic Sen. Barack Obama.
Mark Gorenberg, a San Francisco venture capitalist, spent the first quarter of
this year raising money for Mr. Obama's presidential campaign. But Mr. Gorenberg
says he plans to spend much of his time the rest of this year raising money for
Democratic Senate candidates.
"Most people are unaware of spending limits and feel they can write many
presidential checks," leaving less for congressional candidates, he says.
Thomas Quinn, a lawyer and registered lobbyist at Venable LLC in Washington, says
he has already contributed to the primary races of Sens. Clinton, Christopher
Dodd of Connecticut and Joseph Biden of Delaware, as well as to New Mexico Gov.
Bill Richardson, all Democratic presidential candidates. Mr. Quinn also says he
would have given to the presidential campaigns of Mr. Obama and former North Carolina
Sen. John Edwards, but says they have refused contributions from registered lobbyists.
Meanwhile, several New York bankers and lawyers privately say that they, too,
are spreading largess among multiple presidential candidates. Some say they are
doing so to promote debate, giving multiple candidates an opportunity to state
their views. "The contribution limits are so low, and you're dealing with
people who can easily write a check for $2,300," says Kent Cooper of PoliticalMoneyLine,
a Washington-based research group. People are also giving to multiple candidates
as favors to friends and business associates -- and to hedge their bets to make
sure they have done something for whoever becomes the general campaign's candidate.
"I'll be maxed out earlier than usual this cycle," Mr. Quinn says. "Everyone
is in play."