Follow the Money PDF document

Tainted Democracy  PDF document

Isn't it time voters mattered more than money?

Judicial Campaigns

The judiciary is the third branch of government and is designed to be the final interpreter of the law. While the legislature is charged with writing the law and the executive with implementing it, the judiciary’s role is to decide any conflicts that arise under the laws. It is a delicate task that requires thoughtful deliberation, considerable tact, and political independence.

Alas, our judiciary is besieged by numerous attacks on its autonomy. Candidates for the Supreme and Appellate Courts are increasingly dependent on special interests and political parties for their campaign funds. Candidates for trial and appellate bench fear they cannot win an election without first getting slated by local partisan ward heelers. Voters complain that they do not know enough about judges to cast informed votes, while judges and lawyers groups decry election results that fly in the face of bar evaluations.

These issues are contributing to the evaporation of confidence in our courts. In a recent survey:

  • more than 85 percent said they believe campaign contributions influence the decisions of Illinois judges.
  • Nearly 67 percent said that the cost of running for the Illinois Supreme Court have become too expensive;
  • 58.5 percent believe the high cost often has stopped some people with the potential to be good judges from running for the judiciary;
  • 75.4 percent favor limits on the size of campaign contributions to judicial candidates.
Working in partnership with a number of bench, bar, and civic organizations, including the American Bar Association, Chicago Council of Lawyers, and our partners in the Justice at Stake- Illinois coalition, ICPR is exploring ways to improve the selection process, from the trial bench to the highest court in the land. These efforts may include public financing of judicial elections, revisions to the partisan slating process, non-partisan elections, and/or improving voter education.

Election Resources
ICPR strives to provide voters with non-partisan, unbiased and relevant information about judicial candidates and judicial elections in Illinois. By providing research and background information to the media and to the general public, ICPR’s media guides, voters’ guides and fact sheets give voters the tools to help them cast informed votes on election day.

Click here for some examples of our voter education materials from the November 2006 elections, including the Media Guide and the Voters’ Guide, and the ICPR Judicial Elections Archives.

Judicial Campaigns: Public Opinion Polls
The people of Illinois are concerned with the rising costs of judicial elections and the independence of our judiciary. In the past two election cycles, ICPR asked voters what they thought about judicial campaigns in Illinois. These survey results sadly reflect a growing public opinion that justice in our courtrooms is influenced by campaign dollars. However, the polls also recognized that the people of Illinois are ready and willing to make improvements to our system of judicial elections. Click on the links below to find out more about these polls, the opinions of Illinois voters and the reforms proposed to improve judicial campaigns in Illinois.

click here for 2004 results
click here for 2002 results (PDF)

ICPR’s Current Judicial Reform Projects
Illinois judges are caught in a web of campaign contributions from litigants, complex bar evaluations, partisan slating and primary endorsements that undermine public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary and threaten judges’ independence.

Reform Proposals

Public Financing
If you want to run for public office in Illinois, the first question campaign staff, political parties, and even reporters will ask you is, can you raise the money? Even before the first votes are cast, observers note the existence of a “money primary” where a candidate’s strength is measured solely by how much money they can raise.

There are many good, qualified people who could serve as judges in Illinois. Unfortunately, not all of them can raise enough funds to run for election. But money should not be a barrier to holding public office.

The primary goal of public financing proposals is to reduce the influence of special interest money and in the case of judicial public financing, encourage public confidence in the judiciary.

Based upon the demonstrated successes with judicial public financing in other states, ICPR, along with a broad range of grassroots and reform organizations, in addition to the Justice at Stake – Illinois coalition, strongly supports a new system of public financing for judicial campaigns.

Voters' Guides
Voters' Guides are a state-sponsored method of reaching out to voters and encouraging them to learn more about candidates for office. Voters' Guides include valuable information on every candidate on the statewide ballot, operating voting machines, registering to vote, and other important voting information. Local municipalities can insert information on candidates running for local office, so that every voter has profiles of every candidate on his or her ballot. Voters' Guides would be sent to every household in Illinois, and be made available on-line.

The Illinois Voters' Guide Task Force, a bipartisan blue ribbon task force convened by ICPR chair former Senator Simon and co-chaired by State Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka and Secretary of State Jesse White, reported that these problems could be reduced, and voter confidence in the election improved, through a statewide voters' guide. They called for the creation of a pilot project, to last for three election cycles, where every Illinois household would receive a statewide voters' guide.

ICPR and Justice at Stake are proud to provide Illinois voters with the Illinois Judicial Voters’ Guide, an interactive website designed to provide voters with key information about Illinois judicial candidates and elections. The 2006 Voters’ Guide was the third election cycle in which the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform and Justice at Stake offered this resource. The site provides background on the Illinois court system, information on Illinois judicial elections, 2006 judicial candidate pages, links to bar associations and other sources of information.

Search contribution and expenditure information for Illinois politicians.

Cycle:
Last Name:
 
Search

4/30/2008 - ICPR Statement on Pay-to-Play Legislation


4/21/2008 - ICPR Finds $5 Million in Lobbying Spending by Units of Illinois Government


3/3/2008 - ICPR Files a Complaint with State Board of Elections


2/19/2008 - Midwest Democracy Network Calls for Presidential Candidates to Clarify Reforms Positions


10/9/2007 - Read Cindi Canary's Letter to House Leaders Urging the Passing of HB1

Spotcheck is the e-mail newsletter of ICPR. It contains news and information on our activities. To subscribe, please email us at sc@ilcampaign.org.